Objectives Approach Inputs Steps Outputs
As indicated by the Requirements Management circle at the centre of the ADM graphic, the ADM is continuously driven by the Requirements Management process.
It is important to note that the Requirements Management circle denotes, not a static set of requirements, but a dynamic process whereby requirements for enterprise architecture and subsequent changes to those requirements are identified, stored, and fed into and out of the relevant ADM phases.
The ability to deal with changes in requirements is crucial. Architecture is an activity that by its very nature deals with uncertainty and change - the "grey area" between what stakeholders aspire to and what can be specified and engineered as a solution. Architecture requirements are therefore invariably subject to change in practice. Moreover, Architecture often deals with drivers and constraints, many of which by their very nature are beyond the control of the enterprise (changing market conditions, new legislation, etc.), and which can produce changes in requirements in an unforeseen manner.
Note also that the Requirements Management process itself does not dispose of, address, or prioritize any requirements: this is done within the relevant phase of the ADM. It is merely the process for managing requirements throughout the overall ADM.
The world of Requirements Engineering is rich with emerging recommendations and processes for Requirements Management. TOGAF does not mandate or recommend any specific process or tool: it simply states what an effective Requirements Management process should achieve (i.e., the "requirements for requirements", if you like).
One effective technique that is described in TOGAF itself is Business Scenarios, which are an appropriate and useful technique to discover and document business requirements, and to articulate an architectural vision that responds to those requirements. Business Scenarios are described in detail in Part IV of TOGAF.
Architecture requirements is very much a niche area within the overall requirements field. One useful resource is the Volere Requirements Specification Template, available from the Volere web site hosted by the Atlantic Systems Guild. While not designed with architecture requirements in mind, this is a very useful requirements template, which is freely available and may be modified or copied (for internal use, provided the copyright is appropriately acknowledged).
One interesting item in this template is the "Waiting Room", which is a hold-all for requirements in waiting. There are often requirements identified which, as a result of the prioritization activity that forms part of the Requirements Management process (see below), are designated as beyond the planned scope, or the time available, for the current iteration of the architecture. The "Waiting Room" is a repository of future requirements. Having the ability to store such requirements helps avoid the perception that they are simply being discarded, while at the same time helping to manage expectations about what will be delivered.
There is a large, and increasing, number of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) tools available for the support of requirements management, albeit not necessarily designed for architecture requirements. The Volere web site has a very useful list of leading requirements tools.
The inputs to the Requirements Management process are the requirements-related outputs from each ADM phase.
The first high-level requirements are articulated as part of the Architecture Vision, generated by means of the Business Scenario or analogous technique.
Each architecture domain then generates detailed design requirements specific to that domain, and potentially to other domains (for example, areas where already designed architecture domains may need to change to cater for changes in this architecture domain; constraints on other architecture domains still to be designed.)
Deliverables in later ADM phases also contain mappings to the design requirements, and may also generate new types of requirements (for example, conformance requirements; time windows for implementation).
Key steps in the Requirements Management process include:
Requirements Management Steps | ADM Phase steps | |
1 | Identify / document requirements - use Business Scenarios, or an analogous technique. | |
2 | Baseline requirements: a) Determine priorities
arising from current phase of ADM. |
|
3 | Monitor baseline requirements | |
4 | Identify changed requirement: a) Remove or re-assess priorities. |
|
5 | Identify changed requirement and record priorities: a) Identify changed
requirements and ensure the requirements are prioritized by the architect(s) responsible
for the current phase, and by the relevant stakeholders. Notes:
|
|
6 | a) Assess impact of changed requirements on
current (active) phase. b) Assess impact of changed requirements on previous phases. c) Determine whether to implement change, or defer to later ADM cycle. If decision is to implement, assess timescale for change management implementation. d) Issue Requirements Impact Statement version n+1. |
|
7 | Implement requirements arising from
Architecture Change Management phase.
|
|
8 | Update the Requirements Repository with information relating to the changes requested, including stakeholder views affected. | |
9 | Implement change in the current phase. | |
10 | Assess and revise Gap Analysis for past phases. The Gap Analysis in the ADM phases B through D identifies the gaps between baseline and target architectures. Certain types of gap can give rise to gap requirements. The ADM describes two kinds of gap: A "gap requirement" is anything that has been eliminated by accident, and therefore requires a change to the target architecture. If the gap analysis generates gap requirements, then this step will ensure that they are addressed, documented, and recorded in the requirements repository, and that the target architecture is revised accordingly. |
The output of the Requirements Management process itself is:
Copyright © The Open Group, 2003